Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Operation Waiting Times in Patients Having Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury; with or without Bony Lesions

Purpose To compare the time intervals to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment in patients having traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) with and without bony lesions. Methods Retrospectively analyzed adult patients visited Kyungpook National University Hospital and underwent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeong Heo, Woo-Kie Min, Chang-Wug Oh, Joon-Woo Kim, Kyeong-hyeon Park, Il Seo, Eung-Kyoo Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Traumatology 2019-06-01
Series:Journal of Trauma and Injury
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jtraumainj.org/upload/pdf/jti-32-080.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841558887375831040
author Jeong Heo
Woo-Kie Min
Chang-Wug Oh
Joon-Woo Kim
Kyeong-hyeon Park
Il Seo
Eung-Kyoo Park
author_facet Jeong Heo
Woo-Kie Min
Chang-Wug Oh
Joon-Woo Kim
Kyeong-hyeon Park
Il Seo
Eung-Kyoo Park
author_sort Jeong Heo
collection DOAJ
description Purpose To compare the time intervals to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment in patients having traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) with and without bony lesions. Methods Retrospectively analyzed adult patients visited Kyungpook National University Hospital and underwent surgical treatment for cervical SCI within 24 hours. The patients who were suspected of having cervical SCI underwent plain radiography and computed tomography (CT) upon arrival. After the initial evaluation, we evaluated the MRI findings to determine surgical treatment. Waiting times for MRI and surgery were evaluated. Results Thirty-four patients were included. Patients’ mean age was 57 (range, 23-80) years. Patients with definite bony lesions were classified into group A, and 10 cases were identified (fracture-dislocation, seven; fracture alone, three). Patients without bony lesions were classified into group B, and 24 cases were identified (ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, 16; cervical spondylotic myelopathy, eight). Mean intervals between emergency room arrival and start of MRI were 93.60 (±60.08) minutes in group A and 313.75 (±264.89) minutes in group B, and the interval was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (p=0.01). The mean times to surgery were 248.4 (±76.03) minutes in group A and 560.5 (±372.56) minutes in group B, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.001). The American Spinal Injury Association scale at the time of arrival showed that group A had a relatively severe neurologic deficit compared with group B (p=0.046). There was no statistical significance, but it seems to be good neurological recovery, if we start treatment sooner among patients treated within 24 hours (p=0.198). Conclusions If fracture or dislocation is detected by CT, cervical SCI can be easily predicted resulting in MRI and surgical treatment being performed more rapidly. Additionally, fracture or dislocation tends to cause more severe neurological damage, so it is assumed that rapid diagnosis and treatment are possible.
format Article
id doaj-art-000fc2269c8d42649414a1a495332e3d
institution Kabale University
issn 1738-8767
2287-1683
language English
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Korean Society of Traumatology
record_format Article
series Journal of Trauma and Injury
spelling doaj-art-000fc2269c8d42649414a1a495332e3d2025-01-06T01:15:47ZengKorean Society of TraumatologyJournal of Trauma and Injury1738-87672287-16832019-06-01322808510.20408/jti.2019.004983Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Operation Waiting Times in Patients Having Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury; with or without Bony LesionsJeong Heo0Woo-Kie Min1Chang-Wug Oh2Joon-Woo Kim3Kyeong-hyeon Park4Il Seo5Eung-Kyoo Park6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, KoreaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, KoreaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, KoreaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, KoreaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, KoreaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, KoreaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, KoreaPurpose To compare the time intervals to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment in patients having traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) with and without bony lesions. Methods Retrospectively analyzed adult patients visited Kyungpook National University Hospital and underwent surgical treatment for cervical SCI within 24 hours. The patients who were suspected of having cervical SCI underwent plain radiography and computed tomography (CT) upon arrival. After the initial evaluation, we evaluated the MRI findings to determine surgical treatment. Waiting times for MRI and surgery were evaluated. Results Thirty-four patients were included. Patients’ mean age was 57 (range, 23-80) years. Patients with definite bony lesions were classified into group A, and 10 cases were identified (fracture-dislocation, seven; fracture alone, three). Patients without bony lesions were classified into group B, and 24 cases were identified (ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, 16; cervical spondylotic myelopathy, eight). Mean intervals between emergency room arrival and start of MRI were 93.60 (±60.08) minutes in group A and 313.75 (±264.89) minutes in group B, and the interval was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (p=0.01). The mean times to surgery were 248.4 (±76.03) minutes in group A and 560.5 (±372.56) minutes in group B, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.001). The American Spinal Injury Association scale at the time of arrival showed that group A had a relatively severe neurologic deficit compared with group B (p=0.046). There was no statistical significance, but it seems to be good neurological recovery, if we start treatment sooner among patients treated within 24 hours (p=0.198). Conclusions If fracture or dislocation is detected by CT, cervical SCI can be easily predicted resulting in MRI and surgical treatment being performed more rapidly. Additionally, fracture or dislocation tends to cause more severe neurological damage, so it is assumed that rapid diagnosis and treatment are possible.http://www.jtraumainj.org/upload/pdf/jti-32-080.pdfspinal cord injuriesretrospective studiesspinal injuriesdiagnosis
spellingShingle Jeong Heo
Woo-Kie Min
Chang-Wug Oh
Joon-Woo Kim
Kyeong-hyeon Park
Il Seo
Eung-Kyoo Park
Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Operation Waiting Times in Patients Having Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury; with or without Bony Lesions
Journal of Trauma and Injury
spinal cord injuries
retrospective studies
spinal injuries
diagnosis
title Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Operation Waiting Times in Patients Having Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury; with or without Bony Lesions
title_full Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Operation Waiting Times in Patients Having Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury; with or without Bony Lesions
title_fullStr Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Operation Waiting Times in Patients Having Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury; with or without Bony Lesions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Operation Waiting Times in Patients Having Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury; with or without Bony Lesions
title_short Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Operation Waiting Times in Patients Having Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury; with or without Bony Lesions
title_sort comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and operation waiting times in patients having traumatic cervical spinal cord injury with or without bony lesions
topic spinal cord injuries
retrospective studies
spinal injuries
diagnosis
url http://www.jtraumainj.org/upload/pdf/jti-32-080.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongheo comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingandoperationwaitingtimesinpatientshavingtraumaticcervicalspinalcordinjurywithorwithoutbonylesions
AT wookiemin comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingandoperationwaitingtimesinpatientshavingtraumaticcervicalspinalcordinjurywithorwithoutbonylesions
AT changwugoh comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingandoperationwaitingtimesinpatientshavingtraumaticcervicalspinalcordinjurywithorwithoutbonylesions
AT joonwookim comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingandoperationwaitingtimesinpatientshavingtraumaticcervicalspinalcordinjurywithorwithoutbonylesions
AT kyeonghyeonpark comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingandoperationwaitingtimesinpatientshavingtraumaticcervicalspinalcordinjurywithorwithoutbonylesions
AT ilseo comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingandoperationwaitingtimesinpatientshavingtraumaticcervicalspinalcordinjurywithorwithoutbonylesions
AT eungkyoopark comparisonofmagneticresonanceimagingandoperationwaitingtimesinpatientshavingtraumaticcervicalspinalcordinjurywithorwithoutbonylesions