Pairwise Performance Comparison of Docking Scoring Functions: Computational Approach Using InterCriteria Analysis

Scoring functions are key elements in docking protocols as they approximate the binding affinity of a ligand (usually a small bioactive molecule) by calculating its interaction energy with a biomacromolecule (usually a protein). In this study, we present a pairwise comparison of scoring functions ap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Angelova, Petko Alov, Ivanka Tsakovska, Dessislava Jereva, Iglika Lessigiarska, Krassimir Atanassov, Ilza Pajeva, Tania Pencheva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/30/13/2777
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Scoring functions are key elements in docking protocols as they approximate the binding affinity of a ligand (usually a small bioactive molecule) by calculating its interaction energy with a biomacromolecule (usually a protein). In this study, we present a pairwise comparison of scoring functions applying a multi-criterion decision-making approach based on InterCriteria analysis (ICrA). As criteria, the five scoring functions implemented in MOE (Molecular Operating Environment) software were selected, and their performance on a set of protein–ligand complexes from the PDBbind database was compared. The following docking outputs were used: the best docking score, the lowest root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the predicted poses and the co-crystallized ligand, the RMSD between the best docking score pose and the co-crystallized ligand, and the docking score of the pose with the lowest RMSD to the co-crystallized ligand. The impact of ICrA thresholds on the relations between the scoring functions was investigated. A correlation analysis was also performed and juxtaposed with the ICrA. Our results reveal the lowest RMSD as the best-performing docking output and two scoring functions (Alpha HB and London dG) as having the highest comparability. The proposed approach can be applied to any other scoring functions and protein–ligand complexes of interest.
ISSN:1420-3049