A theory of Legal Argumentation: The theory of rational Discourse as theory of Legal Justification.
Saved in:
| Other Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford,
Oxford University Press,
1989
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View in OPAC |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Part I. Furthering debate between leading theories of Law
- The Explantory Role of the Weak Natural Law Thesis
- In Defense of Hart
- Law's Authority is not a Claim to Preemption
- The Normative Fallacy Regarding Law's Authority
- The Problem about the Nature of Law vis-à-vis Legal Rationality Revisited : Towards an Integrative Jurisprudence
- Part II. The Power of Legal Systems
- Law as Power : Two Rule of Law Requirements
- A Comprehensive Hartian Theory of Legal Obligation : Social Pressure, Coercive Enforcement, and the Legal Obligations of Citizens
- Law and the Entitlement to Coerce
- Part III. Conceptual Analysis
- Farewell to Conceptual Analysis (in Jurisprudence)
- What Do We Want Law to Be? Philosophical Analysis and the Concept of Law
- Part IV. New Directions
- Legal as a Thick Concept
- Making Old Questions New : Legality, Legal System, and State
- Legal Disagreements and the Dual Nature of Law
- Is There One Right Answer to the Question of the Nature of Law?