Evaluating the Effectiveness and Complications of Robotic vs Other Surgery Techniques for Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair and replacement are common critical surgical procedures. Traditional open-heart surgery has long been the standard approach, offering reliable outcomes through direct visualization and access to the heart. However, advancements in minimally invasive techniques, parti...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Medical Students |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ijms.info/IJMS/article/view/2917 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850101082466811904 |
|---|---|
| author | Carlos Esteban Vidal Valderrama Ramon Isaac Zavala Garcia Yeisson Rivero Moreno Raul Antunez Perez Jessica Edith Acevedo Rodriguez Vanessa Pamela Salolin-Vargas Leopoldo David Trujillo-García Mauricio Alejandro Saldaña-Ruiz Noe Alejandro Zúñiga González Vanessa Jarelly Rodríguez-Huerta Carolina Cantú Navarro |
| author_facet | Carlos Esteban Vidal Valderrama Ramon Isaac Zavala Garcia Yeisson Rivero Moreno Raul Antunez Perez Jessica Edith Acevedo Rodriguez Vanessa Pamela Salolin-Vargas Leopoldo David Trujillo-García Mauricio Alejandro Saldaña-Ruiz Noe Alejandro Zúñiga González Vanessa Jarelly Rodríguez-Huerta Carolina Cantú Navarro |
| author_sort | Carlos Esteban Vidal Valderrama |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair and replacement are common critical surgical procedures. Traditional open-heart surgery has long been the standard approach, offering reliable outcomes through direct visualization and access to the heart. However, advancements in minimally invasive techniques, particularly robotic-assisted surgery, have introduced new possibilities in the field of cardiac surgery and benefits to the patients regarding the outcomes and complications. Despite these advantages, the technique requires specialized training and has a steep learning curve, leading to variability in outcomes depending on the surgeon’s experience. This abstract aims to compare robotic mitral valve repair versus other surgical techniques, providing insights into the evolving approaches to performing this procedure.
METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies comparing robotic surgery with conventional techniques and MIS in patients located in Turkey, Italy, Japan, USA, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, England and China.
RESULTS: Eighteen studies with 16,220 adult patients were included in this project. Hospital stay and complications were significantly shorter than conventional procedures in length of stay and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay. The mean difference of ICU stay of the conventional group was -0.85 days [95% CI -1.22, -0.47] compared to the robotic group. The mean difference of length of stay in the conventional group was -1.34 days [95% CI -2.12, -0.57] compared to the robotic group. The odds ratio of the mortality overall of the two groups was significantly lower with 0.65 [95% CI 0.44, 0.95] compared to the robotic group. However, the robotic group was associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp. Total transfusion rate and overall complications did not show a significant difference.
CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional and MIS procedures, robotic surgery has the advantage of reduced hospital stays, ICU stays and mortality. Therefore, we suggest that surgical decisions should be tailored to each case, considering previous experience. This highlights the importance of personalized evaluations for achieving the best treatment results.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cf9f07da8df24e50b184a032b4974263 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2076-6327 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | University Library System, University of Pittsburgh |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Medical Students |
| spelling | doaj-art-cf9f07da8df24e50b184a032b49742632025-08-20T02:40:08ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghInternational Journal of Medical Students2076-63272024-12-0112Evaluating the Effectiveness and Complications of Robotic vs Other Surgery Techniques for Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysisCarlos Esteban Vidal Valderrama0Ramon Isaac Zavala Garcia1Yeisson Rivero Moreno2Raul Antunez Perez3Jessica Edith Acevedo Rodriguez4Vanessa Pamela Salolin-Vargas5Leopoldo David Trujillo-García6Mauricio Alejandro Saldaña-Ruiz7Noe Alejandro Zúñiga González8Vanessa Jarelly Rodríguez-Huerta9Carolina Cantú Navarro10Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada, México.Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada, México.Universidad de Oriente, Puerto de la Cruz, Bolivariana República de Venezuela.Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada, México.Tecnológico de Monterrey, Zapopan, México.Universidad Westhill, Ciudad de México, México.Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.Facultad de Medicina y Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González, Monterrey, MéxicoUniversidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, México.Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México.Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, México. BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair and replacement are common critical surgical procedures. Traditional open-heart surgery has long been the standard approach, offering reliable outcomes through direct visualization and access to the heart. However, advancements in minimally invasive techniques, particularly robotic-assisted surgery, have introduced new possibilities in the field of cardiac surgery and benefits to the patients regarding the outcomes and complications. Despite these advantages, the technique requires specialized training and has a steep learning curve, leading to variability in outcomes depending on the surgeon’s experience. This abstract aims to compare robotic mitral valve repair versus other surgical techniques, providing insights into the evolving approaches to performing this procedure. METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies comparing robotic surgery with conventional techniques and MIS in patients located in Turkey, Italy, Japan, USA, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, England and China. RESULTS: Eighteen studies with 16,220 adult patients were included in this project. Hospital stay and complications were significantly shorter than conventional procedures in length of stay and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay. The mean difference of ICU stay of the conventional group was -0.85 days [95% CI -1.22, -0.47] compared to the robotic group. The mean difference of length of stay in the conventional group was -1.34 days [95% CI -2.12, -0.57] compared to the robotic group. The odds ratio of the mortality overall of the two groups was significantly lower with 0.65 [95% CI 0.44, 0.95] compared to the robotic group. However, the robotic group was associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp. Total transfusion rate and overall complications did not show a significant difference. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional and MIS procedures, robotic surgery has the advantage of reduced hospital stays, ICU stays and mortality. Therefore, we suggest that surgical decisions should be tailored to each case, considering previous experience. This highlights the importance of personalized evaluations for achieving the best treatment results. http://ijms.info/IJMS/article/view/2917Robotic Surgical ProceduresMitral ValveMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures |
| spellingShingle | Carlos Esteban Vidal Valderrama Ramon Isaac Zavala Garcia Yeisson Rivero Moreno Raul Antunez Perez Jessica Edith Acevedo Rodriguez Vanessa Pamela Salolin-Vargas Leopoldo David Trujillo-García Mauricio Alejandro Saldaña-Ruiz Noe Alejandro Zúñiga González Vanessa Jarelly Rodríguez-Huerta Carolina Cantú Navarro Evaluating the Effectiveness and Complications of Robotic vs Other Surgery Techniques for Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis International Journal of Medical Students Robotic Surgical Procedures Mitral Valve Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures |
| title | Evaluating the Effectiveness and Complications of Robotic vs Other Surgery Techniques for Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
| title_full | Evaluating the Effectiveness and Complications of Robotic vs Other Surgery Techniques for Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating the Effectiveness and Complications of Robotic vs Other Surgery Techniques for Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Effectiveness and Complications of Robotic vs Other Surgery Techniques for Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
| title_short | Evaluating the Effectiveness and Complications of Robotic vs Other Surgery Techniques for Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
| title_sort | evaluating the effectiveness and complications of robotic vs other surgery techniques for mitral valve repair or replacement a comprehensive systematic review and meta analysis |
| topic | Robotic Surgical Procedures Mitral Valve Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures |
| url | http://ijms.info/IJMS/article/view/2917 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carlosestebanvidalvalderrama evaluatingtheeffectivenessandcomplicationsofroboticvsothersurgerytechniquesformitralvalverepairorreplacementacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ramonisaaczavalagarcia evaluatingtheeffectivenessandcomplicationsofroboticvsothersurgerytechniquesformitralvalverepairorreplacementacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yeissonriveromoreno evaluatingtheeffectivenessandcomplicationsofroboticvsothersurgerytechniquesformitralvalverepairorreplacementacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT raulantunezperez evaluatingtheeffectivenessandcomplicationsofroboticvsothersurgerytechniquesformitralvalverepairorreplacementacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jessicaedithacevedorodriguez evaluatingtheeffectivenessandcomplicationsofroboticvsothersurgerytechniquesformitralvalverepairorreplacementacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vanessapamelasalolinvargas evaluatingtheeffectivenessandcomplicationsofroboticvsothersurgerytechniquesformitralvalverepairorreplacementacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leopoldodavidtrujillogarcia evaluatingtheeffectivenessandcomplicationsofroboticvsothersurgerytechniquesformitralvalverepairorreplacementacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mauricioalejandrosaldanaruiz evaluatingtheeffectivenessandcomplicationsofroboticvsothersurgerytechniquesformitralvalverepairorreplacementacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT noealejandrozunigagonzalez evaluatingtheeffectivenessandcomplicationsofroboticvsothersurgerytechniquesformitralvalverepairorreplacementacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vanessajarellyrodriguezhuerta evaluatingtheeffectivenessandcomplicationsofroboticvsothersurgerytechniquesformitralvalverepairorreplacementacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT carolinacantunavarro evaluatingtheeffectivenessandcomplicationsofroboticvsothersurgerytechniquesformitralvalverepairorreplacementacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |