Development, validation and recalibration of a prediction model for prediabetes: an EHR and NHANES-based study

Abstract Background A prediction model that estimates the risk of elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was developed from electronic health record (EHR) data to identify adult patients at risk for prediabetes who may otherwise go undetected. We aimed to assess the internal performance of a new penal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas J. Casacchia, Kristin M. Lenoir, Joseph Rigdon, Brian J. Wells
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02803-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850244648888434688
author Nicholas J. Casacchia
Kristin M. Lenoir
Joseph Rigdon
Brian J. Wells
author_facet Nicholas J. Casacchia
Kristin M. Lenoir
Joseph Rigdon
Brian J. Wells
author_sort Nicholas J. Casacchia
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background A prediction model that estimates the risk of elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was developed from electronic health record (EHR) data to identify adult patients at risk for prediabetes who may otherwise go undetected. We aimed to assess the internal performance of a new penalized regression model using the same EHR data and compare it to the previously developed stepdown approximation for predicting HbA1c ≥ 5.7%, the cut-off for prediabetes. Additionally, we sought to externally validate and recalibrate the approximation model using 2017–2020 pre-pandemic National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. Methods We developed logistic regression models using EHR data through two approaches: the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and stepdown approximation. Internal validation was performed using the bootstrap method, with internal performance evaluated by the Brier score, C-statistic, calibration intercept and slope, and the integrated calibration index. We externally validated the approximation model by applying original model coefficients to NHANES, and we examined the approximation model’s performance after recalibration in NHANES. Results The EHR cohort included 22,635 patients, with 26% identified as having prediabetes. Both the LASSO and approximation models demonstrated similar discrimination in the EHR cohort, with optimism-corrected C-statistics of 0.760 and 0.763, respectively. The LASSO model included 23 predictor variables, while the approximation model contained 8. Among the 2,348 NHANES participants who met the inclusion criteria, 30.1% had prediabetes. External validation of the LASSO model was not possible due to the unavailability of some predictor variables. The approximation model discriminated well in the NHANES dataset, achieving a C-statistic of 0.787. Conclusion The approximation method demonstrated comparable performance to LASSO in the EHR development cohort, making it a viable option for healthcare organizations with limited resources to collect a comprehensive set of candidate predictor variables. NHANES data may be suitable for externally validating a clinical prediction model developed with EHR data to assess generalizability to a nationally representative sample, depending on the model’s intended use and the alignment of predictor variable definitions with those used in the model’s original development.
format Article
id doaj-art-58dc3dc0b74b4d9f8eb910a2b1cc9ce1
institution OA Journals
issn 1472-6947
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
spelling doaj-art-58dc3dc0b74b4d9f8eb910a2b1cc9ce12025-08-20T01:59:40ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472024-12-0124111110.1186/s12911-024-02803-wDevelopment, validation and recalibration of a prediction model for prediabetes: an EHR and NHANES-based studyNicholas J. Casacchia0Kristin M. Lenoir1Joseph Rigdon2Brian J. Wells3Center for Value-Based Care Research, Primary Care Institute, Cleveland ClinicDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of MedicineDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of MedicineDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of MedicineAbstract Background A prediction model that estimates the risk of elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was developed from electronic health record (EHR) data to identify adult patients at risk for prediabetes who may otherwise go undetected. We aimed to assess the internal performance of a new penalized regression model using the same EHR data and compare it to the previously developed stepdown approximation for predicting HbA1c ≥ 5.7%, the cut-off for prediabetes. Additionally, we sought to externally validate and recalibrate the approximation model using 2017–2020 pre-pandemic National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. Methods We developed logistic regression models using EHR data through two approaches: the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and stepdown approximation. Internal validation was performed using the bootstrap method, with internal performance evaluated by the Brier score, C-statistic, calibration intercept and slope, and the integrated calibration index. We externally validated the approximation model by applying original model coefficients to NHANES, and we examined the approximation model’s performance after recalibration in NHANES. Results The EHR cohort included 22,635 patients, with 26% identified as having prediabetes. Both the LASSO and approximation models demonstrated similar discrimination in the EHR cohort, with optimism-corrected C-statistics of 0.760 and 0.763, respectively. The LASSO model included 23 predictor variables, while the approximation model contained 8. Among the 2,348 NHANES participants who met the inclusion criteria, 30.1% had prediabetes. External validation of the LASSO model was not possible due to the unavailability of some predictor variables. The approximation model discriminated well in the NHANES dataset, achieving a C-statistic of 0.787. Conclusion The approximation method demonstrated comparable performance to LASSO in the EHR development cohort, making it a viable option for healthcare organizations with limited resources to collect a comprehensive set of candidate predictor variables. NHANES data may be suitable for externally validating a clinical prediction model developed with EHR data to assess generalizability to a nationally representative sample, depending on the model’s intended use and the alignment of predictor variable definitions with those used in the model’s original development.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02803-wElectronic health recordsNHANESPrediabetesPrediction modelLogistic regressionLASSO
spellingShingle Nicholas J. Casacchia
Kristin M. Lenoir
Joseph Rigdon
Brian J. Wells
Development, validation and recalibration of a prediction model for prediabetes: an EHR and NHANES-based study
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Electronic health records
NHANES
Prediabetes
Prediction model
Logistic regression
LASSO
title Development, validation and recalibration of a prediction model for prediabetes: an EHR and NHANES-based study
title_full Development, validation and recalibration of a prediction model for prediabetes: an EHR and NHANES-based study
title_fullStr Development, validation and recalibration of a prediction model for prediabetes: an EHR and NHANES-based study
title_full_unstemmed Development, validation and recalibration of a prediction model for prediabetes: an EHR and NHANES-based study
title_short Development, validation and recalibration of a prediction model for prediabetes: an EHR and NHANES-based study
title_sort development validation and recalibration of a prediction model for prediabetes an ehr and nhanes based study
topic Electronic health records
NHANES
Prediabetes
Prediction model
Logistic regression
LASSO
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02803-w
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasjcasacchia developmentvalidationandrecalibrationofapredictionmodelforprediabetesanehrandnhanesbasedstudy
AT kristinmlenoir developmentvalidationandrecalibrationofapredictionmodelforprediabetesanehrandnhanesbasedstudy
AT josephrigdon developmentvalidationandrecalibrationofapredictionmodelforprediabetesanehrandnhanesbasedstudy
AT brianjwells developmentvalidationandrecalibrationofapredictionmodelforprediabetesanehrandnhanesbasedstudy