ACTIVITY OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE BODIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROSECUTION OF PHYSICAL AND JURIDICAL PERSONS FOR CORRUPTION LAW BREACHES

Objective: to analyze the problems of identifying and impleading the persons guilty of corruptive administrative offenses and the role of theProsecutor’s Office in this activity.Methods: formal logical method, systemic method, comparative legal, statistical.Results: the author proposes to include a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. K. Iliy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd. 2016-12-01
Series:Russian Journal of Economics and Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2029
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846117023713591296
author S. K. Iliy
author_facet S. K. Iliy
author_sort S. K. Iliy
collection DOAJ
description Objective: to analyze the problems of identifying and impleading the persons guilty of corruptive administrative offenses and the role of theProsecutor’s Office in this activity.Methods: formal logical method, systemic method, comparative legal, statistical.Results: the author proposes to include a special chapter in the Russian Administrative Code on corruptive administrative offences, and to provide for the possibility of exemption from administrative liability of legal persons, who actively contributed to the disclosure and (or) investigation of crime, or when there has been extortion of bribes from officials, or if a legal person after the crime voluntary informed on bribery to the body entitled to institute criminal proceedings. In the process of research, the author proposed a new wording of Article 19.28 of the Russian Administrative Code, providing for liability of not only legal entities but also individuals, engaged in entrepreneurial activities without forming a legal entity.Scientific novelty: the existing problems of impleading for committing corruptive administrative offences are identified and classified, the ways of their solution are proposed.Practical significance: the research results can be used in the practical work of prosecutors, as well as in the development of proposals on improvement of the Russian Code of Administrative Offences.
format Article
id doaj-art-383cc7664e614086a5ebce233b6561f1
institution Kabale University
issn 2782-2923
language English
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.
record_format Article
series Russian Journal of Economics and Law
spelling doaj-art-383cc7664e614086a5ebce233b6561f12024-12-18T11:47:02ZengTatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.Russian Journal of Economics and Law2782-29232016-12-01104274410.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.4.27-442027ACTIVITY OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE BODIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROSECUTION OF PHYSICAL AND JURIDICAL PERSONS FOR CORRUPTION LAW BREACHESS. K. Iliy0Scientific-Research Institute of the Academy of Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian FederationObjective: to analyze the problems of identifying and impleading the persons guilty of corruptive administrative offenses and the role of theProsecutor’s Office in this activity.Methods: formal logical method, systemic method, comparative legal, statistical.Results: the author proposes to include a special chapter in the Russian Administrative Code on corruptive administrative offences, and to provide for the possibility of exemption from administrative liability of legal persons, who actively contributed to the disclosure and (or) investigation of crime, or when there has been extortion of bribes from officials, or if a legal person after the crime voluntary informed on bribery to the body entitled to institute criminal proceedings. In the process of research, the author proposed a new wording of Article 19.28 of the Russian Administrative Code, providing for liability of not only legal entities but also individuals, engaged in entrepreneurial activities without forming a legal entity.Scientific novelty: the existing problems of impleading for committing corruptive administrative offences are identified and classified, the ways of their solution are proposed.Practical significance: the research results can be used in the practical work of prosecutors, as well as in the development of proposals on improvement of the Russian Code of Administrative Offences.https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2029dialectics of corruption counteractioncorruptionadministrative offence related to corruptioncorruption offenceillegal remunerationarticle 19.28 of the administrative codearticle 19.29 of the administrative codecorruption counteraction
spellingShingle S. K. Iliy
ACTIVITY OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE BODIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROSECUTION OF PHYSICAL AND JURIDICAL PERSONS FOR CORRUPTION LAW BREACHES
Russian Journal of Economics and Law
dialectics of corruption counteraction
corruption
administrative offence related to corruption
corruption offence
illegal remuneration
article 19.28 of the administrative code
article 19.29 of the administrative code
corruption counteraction
title ACTIVITY OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE BODIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROSECUTION OF PHYSICAL AND JURIDICAL PERSONS FOR CORRUPTION LAW BREACHES
title_full ACTIVITY OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE BODIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROSECUTION OF PHYSICAL AND JURIDICAL PERSONS FOR CORRUPTION LAW BREACHES
title_fullStr ACTIVITY OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE BODIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROSECUTION OF PHYSICAL AND JURIDICAL PERSONS FOR CORRUPTION LAW BREACHES
title_full_unstemmed ACTIVITY OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE BODIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROSECUTION OF PHYSICAL AND JURIDICAL PERSONS FOR CORRUPTION LAW BREACHES
title_short ACTIVITY OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE BODIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROSECUTION OF PHYSICAL AND JURIDICAL PERSONS FOR CORRUPTION LAW BREACHES
title_sort activity of the prosecutor s office bodies of the russian federation for administrative prosecution of physical and juridical persons for corruption law breaches
topic dialectics of corruption counteraction
corruption
administrative offence related to corruption
corruption offence
illegal remuneration
article 19.28 of the administrative code
article 19.29 of the administrative code
corruption counteraction
url https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2029
work_keys_str_mv AT skiliy activityoftheprosecutorsofficebodiesoftherussianfederationforadministrativeprosecutionofphysicalandjuridicalpersonsforcorruptionlawbreaches