Unpacking community-based architectural pedagogy: A systematic review of current scholarship
Community-based architectural pedagogy encompasses a diverse range of practices – such as live projects, designbuild studios, participatory design, and service-learning – yet the fragmented terminology and varying theoretical underpinnings pose challenges to understanding its broader educational imp...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Spatium |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1450-569X/2025/1450-569X2500005I.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Community-based architectural pedagogy encompasses a diverse range of practices – such as live projects, designbuild studios, participatory design, and service-learning – yet the fragmented terminology and varying theoretical underpinnings pose challenges to understanding its broader educational impact. This systematic review examines ninety-five peer-reviewed and Scopus-indexed publications from 2014–2024 to explore how various approaches address student learning and community participation. Using a mixed-method approach, we combine a systematic quantitative literature review (SQLR) with qualitative thematic analysis to identify five pedagogical orientations: Community-Driven & Participatory Approaches, Experiential & Design-Build Pedagogy, Sustainability & Resilience, Digital & Interdisciplinary Innovation, and Culture, Heritage & Pedagogical Frameworks. While some papers prioritize student learning or community impact, the majority pursue a balanced synergy between both. Furthermore, the review also identifies six recurring pedagogical strategies employed in community-based design education: handson fabrication, collaborative design, place-based learning, digital engagement, sustainable and regenerative design, and community-driven engagement. However, limitations such as tokenism, scalability, and digital access persist. Findings reveal a Western-dominated field, characterized by a concentration of projects and scholarship in the U.S. and European regions with limited representation from non-English contexts, although there is growing global interest. Future models should be able to prioritize longitudinal impact, equitable power-sharing, and scalable hybrid models. This study advances discourse on balancing educational goals with meaningful community engagement. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1450-569X 2217-8066 |