Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon spp. in captive tigers in Thailand

Captive wildlife can serve as reservoirs for various tick-borne pathogens for both domestic animals and humans. Ecotourism tiger parks, where tigers (Panthera tigris) engage with humans and other animals, increase the risk of disease transmission. This study aimed to investigate the infection rate,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Mongkolphan, A. Saechin, T. Chamsai, P. Sedwisai, R. Boonyarittichaikij, S. Tangsudjai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-08-01
Series:International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224425000707
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849771794721931264
author C. Mongkolphan
A. Saechin
T. Chamsai
P. Sedwisai
R. Boonyarittichaikij
S. Tangsudjai
author_facet C. Mongkolphan
A. Saechin
T. Chamsai
P. Sedwisai
R. Boonyarittichaikij
S. Tangsudjai
author_sort C. Mongkolphan
collection DOAJ
description Captive wildlife can serve as reservoirs for various tick-borne pathogens for both domestic animals and humans. Ecotourism tiger parks, where tigers (Panthera tigris) engage with humans and other animals, increase the risk of disease transmission. This study aimed to investigate the infection rate, co-infection patterns, and associated risk factors of tick-borne pathogens (Ehrlichia, Hepatozoon, and Babesia) in captive tigers in Thailand. Blood samples were collected from 100 tigers and analyzed using multiplex PCR to detect the presence of three genera of tick-borne pathogens. The overall infection rate at least one tick-borne pathogen was 17 % (17/100). Ehrlichia canis was the most common, affecting 15 % (15/100) of the tigers, followed by Hepatozoon spp. [5 % (5/100)], with no detected Babesia spp. infection. Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon spp. co-infections were confirmed in 3 % (3/100) of the cases. Infection rates were examined according to sex and age. Female tigers exhibited a higher infection rate (22.22 % (10/45)) than males (12.73 % (7/55)), though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.209). Age was a significant factor, with older tigers showing higher infection rates (p < 0.001). Co-infections were observed in tigers older than seven years. All infected tigers, single or co-infected, commonly exhibited hyperproteinemia, anemia, and elevated creatinine levels in their blood. All pathogens identified in this study posed health risks to captive tigers, with infection rates primarily influenced by age. Ehrlichia canis poses the highest health risk for captive tigers in Thailand. These findings underscore the importance of routine health monitoring and effective tick control strategies to protect these endangered animals.
format Article
id doaj-art-0a75b46eeaba4d8b9db4a7958143f7f1
institution DOAJ
issn 2213-2244
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
spelling doaj-art-0a75b46eeaba4d8b9db4a7958143f7f12025-08-20T03:02:30ZengElsevierInternational Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife2213-22442025-08-012710110510.1016/j.ijppaw.2025.101105Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon spp. in captive tigers in ThailandC. Mongkolphan0A. Saechin1T. Chamsai2P. Sedwisai3R. Boonyarittichaikij4S. Tangsudjai5Monitoring and Surveillance Center for Zoonotic Diseases in Wildlife and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, ThailandMonitoring and Surveillance Center for Zoonotic Diseases in Wildlife and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, ThailandMonitoring and Surveillance Center for Zoonotic Diseases in Wildlife and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, ThailandMonitoring and Surveillance Center for Zoonotic Diseases in Wildlife and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, ThailandDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, ThailandMonitoring and Surveillance Center for Zoonotic Diseases in Wildlife and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand; Corresponding author.Captive wildlife can serve as reservoirs for various tick-borne pathogens for both domestic animals and humans. Ecotourism tiger parks, where tigers (Panthera tigris) engage with humans and other animals, increase the risk of disease transmission. This study aimed to investigate the infection rate, co-infection patterns, and associated risk factors of tick-borne pathogens (Ehrlichia, Hepatozoon, and Babesia) in captive tigers in Thailand. Blood samples were collected from 100 tigers and analyzed using multiplex PCR to detect the presence of three genera of tick-borne pathogens. The overall infection rate at least one tick-borne pathogen was 17 % (17/100). Ehrlichia canis was the most common, affecting 15 % (15/100) of the tigers, followed by Hepatozoon spp. [5 % (5/100)], with no detected Babesia spp. infection. Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon spp. co-infections were confirmed in 3 % (3/100) of the cases. Infection rates were examined according to sex and age. Female tigers exhibited a higher infection rate (22.22 % (10/45)) than males (12.73 % (7/55)), though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.209). Age was a significant factor, with older tigers showing higher infection rates (p < 0.001). Co-infections were observed in tigers older than seven years. All infected tigers, single or co-infected, commonly exhibited hyperproteinemia, anemia, and elevated creatinine levels in their blood. All pathogens identified in this study posed health risks to captive tigers, with infection rates primarily influenced by age. Ehrlichia canis poses the highest health risk for captive tigers in Thailand. These findings underscore the importance of routine health monitoring and effective tick control strategies to protect these endangered animals.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224425000707EhrlichiaHepatozoonTick-borne pathogensCaptive tigersCo-infection
spellingShingle C. Mongkolphan
A. Saechin
T. Chamsai
P. Sedwisai
R. Boonyarittichaikij
S. Tangsudjai
Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon spp. in captive tigers in Thailand
International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
Ehrlichia
Hepatozoon
Tick-borne pathogens
Captive tigers
Co-infection
title Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon spp. in captive tigers in Thailand
title_full Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon spp. in captive tigers in Thailand
title_fullStr Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon spp. in captive tigers in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon spp. in captive tigers in Thailand
title_short Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon spp. in captive tigers in Thailand
title_sort ehrlichia canis and hepatozoon spp in captive tigers in thailand
topic Ehrlichia
Hepatozoon
Tick-borne pathogens
Captive tigers
Co-infection
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224425000707
work_keys_str_mv AT cmongkolphan ehrlichiacanisandhepatozoonsppincaptivetigersinthailand
AT asaechin ehrlichiacanisandhepatozoonsppincaptivetigersinthailand
AT tchamsai ehrlichiacanisandhepatozoonsppincaptivetigersinthailand
AT psedwisai ehrlichiacanisandhepatozoonsppincaptivetigersinthailand
AT rboonyarittichaikij ehrlichiacanisandhepatozoonsppincaptivetigersinthailand
AT stangsudjai ehrlichiacanisandhepatozoonsppincaptivetigersinthailand